Listening to the radio one morning, Ken Clarke came on to explain a concept within the judicial system. Now I always enjoy it when he speaks on the radio, because he always explains things so that it sounds so simple. Law is a complicated subject, but not when Ken is talking about it.
This is quite an art. In years past, I couldn’t get my business ideas across because I made them too complex. Now I am writing my assignments for a diploma in digital marketing, I’m finding it hard because I have to explain things simply. Dumbing down is not easy, but it is necessary – yet it is important not to undermine your audience.
It’s not worth putting absolutely everything into your description. The idea is to assess exactly what is needed from the question offered to you. Work out the most essential items, and then discard those that don’t apply. If you have ended up with one or two things, then you have succeeded!
Simplicity is key when it comes to explanations, but anybody who says it’s not difficult is either lying or a genius. And then the other side of the coin is that if something is made too simple, it has the danger of sounding stupid, inadequate and incomplete. How it is presented is the answer, keeping the audience in mind, and with enough material to fulfill all expectations.
Another tactic for complicated subjects is to break it down into manageable chunks. Don’t bombard your audience all at one go, or their poor brains may explode. It’s easier to digest small portions than to stuff everything in at one go. And simplifying the information will make it that much clearer and therefore more understandable.
Use the sort of language your audience knows, expects and comprehends. Don’t pepper them with jargon and acronyms, you may think it sounds impressive, but truly it’s not. Simple, clear, ordinary words that everybody uses in everyday language is what is more likely to be retained, absorbed and acted upon.
That is exactly what Ken Clarke does, he explains the latest breaking-news about a discrepancy in our legislative system so that everybody can understand it, and so that the radio presenters cannot pick him up on inconsistencies or inexplicable statements. But somehow after he has finished, which during his speech you nod and agree with everything he says, you still find you are none the wiser.